Dog and Animal Attacks Causing Injury* – Malpractice Lawyer Dublin

Dog and Animal Attacks Causing Injury*

Did you know, if you have been attacked by an animal, for example a dog but not necessarily bitten and have suffered personal injury as a result of the attack, i.e. shock or a lasting anxiety you may be entitled to compensation?

Under the Occupiers Liability Act of 1995, the Control of Dogs Acts 1986 and 1992, the Control of Horses Act 1996 and the Animals Act 1985 the owner of an animal has a duty of care to take reasonable steps to ensure the safety of members of the public who come in to contact with that animal.

Each type of animal is categorised differently under the headings “wild or domestic animals”. The Courts recognise that persons who keep a wild animal keep the animal at their own peril and if such an animal causes damage the owner may be strictly liable. The owner of a tame animal however is liable only if he knows that the animal has a “mischievous propensity” to do the damage complained of. However in the case of a dog, the owner will be strictly liable under Section 21 of the 1986 Act if the dog bites a person. Tame animals include dogs, cats, horse, cattle but there are exceptions to this class of supposed tame animals. For example some dogs are automatically deemed dangerous, in circumstances where they are clearly used as guard dogs for security purposes. So, different rules apply depending upon whether you are the victim of a dog attack or a dog bite.

The knowledge of mischievous propensity which an animal owner must have is actual knowledge, although it does not matter whether it is acquired from personal observation, from hearsay, or through another person.

The injured Plaintiff who argues that the young foal has a tendency to frolic and jump around people or that a dog that bounds enthusiastically at strangers will not have demonstrated a mischievous propensity to prove liability on the part of the animal owner. However it is sufficient for an injured Plaintiff to show that a dog “was always growling at children” (case of Duggan –v- Armstrong 1992) i.e. proof of a mischievous propensity is not that the dog will bite someone but that having displayed a vicious or fierce nature it may do so.

If you have been a victim of an animal attack, dog bite or damage, please contact us for further information and advice.


1800 93 88 93

Contact Info

C.M. Haughey Solicitors,
Christchurch Hall, High Street,
Dublin 8,

Tel (01) 421 4220,
Fax (01) 454 8338

Latest Tweets

*In contentious business, a solicitor may not calculate fees or other charges as a percentage or proportion of any award or settlement.

*This statement is made in compliance with Reg. 8 of the SI 518 or 2002.